Links & Law - Information about legal aspects of search engines, linking and framing

Hyperlink & Search Engine Law News  Decisions & Court Documents Worldwide Legal Resources (Hyperlink & Search Engine Law Articles) Linking Law Cases Search Engine Law Publications by Dr. Stephan Ott Technical    Background

 800-JR Cigar Inc. v.

In 800-JR Cigar, Inc. v., Inc.,et al., the US District Court of New Jersey issued an opinion on whether the use of a trademark as a "keyword" constitutes trademark infringement by a search engine. The plaintiff,  JR Cigar,  is a prominent seller of cigars at discount prices and the owner of six federal trademarks that utilize the formative “JR” or “JR Cigar.” The defendant, GoTo is a pay-for-priority Internet search engine (a search engines that solicits bids from advertisers for key words or phrases to be used as search terms, giving priority results on searches for those terms to the highest-paying advertiser)   formed in 1997 (now Overture). Between April 1999 and June 2001, GoTo earned revenue of about $345 from paid listings for “jr cigar” and related search terms.

The court adopted the reasoning of Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Google Inc., 330 F. Supp. 2d 700, 73 USPQ2d 1212 (E.D. Va. 2004) and held, among other things, that such sales by a search engine constitute a "use" of the trademark "in commerce" within the meaning of federal trademark statutes. According to the court GoTo made use of JR's trademark in three ways:

• GoTo traded on the value of the marks when it accepted payment by competitors of JR desiring to pay for prominence in search results.

• GoTo injected itself into the marketplace by placing the advertisers before the natural search results list, acting as a conduit to steer potential customers away from JR to JR's competitors.

• GoTo's "Search Term Suggestion Tool" identified which of JR's marks were effective search terms, and then marketed them to JR's competitors.

The court concluded, however, that there are disputed issues of fact that preclude a summary judgment ruling on the issue of direct trademark infringement, in particular the likelihood of confusion resulting from the sale of trademark terms as keyword search terms.

For a detailed look at the decision, read:




The Links & Law website is updated regularily, so  check back for updated information and resources about search engine and linking issues.

You are currently in the archive with older news. A complete list of the updates can be found here!


Masthead/Curriculum Vitae
Copyright © 2002-2008 Dr. Stephan Ott 

All Rights Reserved.